| average scores for this employer | |
|---|---|
development process | |
| clear requirements |
![]()
|
| design and planning |
![]()
|
| quality assurance | ![]() |
| automated testing | ![]() |
| peer review |
![]()
|
| development environment |
![]()
|
| development hardware |
![]() ![]()
|
| physical workspace |
![]() ![]()
|
| infrastructure and support |
![]() ![]()
|
| issue tracking |
![]()
|
| source control |
![]()
|
| product quality |
![]()
|
culture | |
| cultivation of creativity |
![]() ![]()
|
| mitigation of risk |
![]()
|
| reasonable workload |
![]()
|
| prevention of crunch time |
![]() ![]()
|
| hitting deadlines |
![]()
|
| taking responsibility |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| development autonomy |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| keeping ego in check |
![]()
|
compensation | |
| salary |
![]() ![]()
|
| health coverage |
![]() ![]()
|
| paid time off |
![]()
|
| snacks | unrated |
| other perks | ![]() |
organization | |
| advancement opportunities |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| employee retention | ![]() |
| hiring process |
![]()
|
| quality of development management |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| quality of upper management | ![]() |
| quality of developers |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| team-to-team communication |
![]()
|
| internal team communication |
![]() ![]()
|
| management-developer communication | ![]() |
general | |
| location |
![]()
|
| nearby food | unrated |
| business model |
![]() ![]()
|
| cool technology |
![]()
|
| vision and strategy | ![]() |
| warm fuzzy feeling |
![]()
|
| overall |
![]() ![]()
|
preferences | |
| casual dress code | ![]() |
| use of Free Software | ![]() |
| development of Free Software | unrated |
| use of GNU/Linux | unrated |
| use of Mac OS | unrated |
| use of Solaris | unrated |
| use of Windows |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| use of BSD | unrated |
| use of Python | unrated |
| use of Perl | unrated |
| use of Ruby | unrated |
| use of Lisp | unrated |
| use of Java | unrated |
| use of C# |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| use of Objective-C | unrated |
| use of C | unrated |
| use of C++ | unrated |
| use of PHP | unrated |
| use of ASP | ![]() |
| use of legacy languages | unrated |
BT INS
-
average score:


- type of organization: public
- size: gargantuan (1,001 to 10,000 people)
- website: bt.ins.com
- development offices:
Consultants in Networks, Security, Microsoft technologies
1 rating
Rate this employer!-


Top-heavy, but trying hard to be human.
posted
by
atfm
on
July 30, 2007
Formerly Raymond James consulting, renamed to Immedient, sold to INS, sold to BT... Lots of changes in management at this consultancy over the years, and the last change was bad for .NET developers, when company lost quite a bit of its app-dev focus.
Company is a bit top-heavy, and management is all over the map, as is common in consultancies. But the team is top-notch, great developers, actual real legitimate training opportunities, and if you demand to be more...
