| average scores for this employer | |
|---|---|
development process | |
| clear requirements | ![]() |
| design and planning |
![]()
|
| quality assurance | ![]() |
| automated testing | ![]() |
| peer review |
![]()
|
| development environment | ![]() |
| development hardware |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| physical workspace |
![]()
|
| infrastructure and support |
![]()
|
| issue tracking | ![]() |
| source control | ![]() |
| product quality |
![]() ![]()
|
culture | |
| cultivation of creativity |
![]()
|
| mitigation of risk | ![]() |
| reasonable workload | ![]() |
| prevention of crunch time | ![]() |
| hitting deadlines | ![]() |
| taking responsibility | ![]() |
| development autonomy | ![]() |
| keeping ego in check | ![]() |
compensation | |
| salary | ![]() |
| health coverage | ![]() |
| paid time off | ![]() |
| snacks |
![]()
|
| other perks |
![]() ![]()
|
organization | |
| advancement opportunities | ![]() |
| employee retention | ![]() |
| hiring process | ![]() |
| quality of development management | ![]() |
| quality of upper management | ![]() |
| quality of developers |
![]()
|
| team-to-team communication | ![]() |
| internal team communication | ![]() |
| management-developer communication | ![]() |
general | |
| location | ![]() |
| nearby food |
![]() ![]()
|
| business model | ![]() |
| cool technology | ![]() |
| vision and strategy | ![]() |
| warm fuzzy feeling | ![]() |
| overall |
![]() ![]()
|
preferences | |
| casual dress code |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| use of Free Software |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| development of Free Software | ![]() |
| use of GNU/Linux | unrated |
| use of Mac OS | unrated |
| use of Solaris | unrated |
| use of Windows |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| use of BSD | unrated |
| use of Python | unrated |
| use of Perl | unrated |
| use of Ruby | unrated |
| use of Lisp | unrated |
| use of Java | unrated |
| use of C# | unrated |
| use of Objective-C | unrated |
| use of C | unrated |
| use of C++ | unrated |
| use of PHP | unrated |
| use of ASP | unrated |
| use of legacy languages | unrated |
Adaptive Methods
-
average score:


- type of organization: private
- size: small (11 to 50 people)
- website: www.adaptivemethods.com
- development offices:
US Defense Contractor focusing on US Navy ASW software products
2 ratings
Rate this employer!-



Very glad to work here
posted
on
September 13, 2008
<This was originally posted October 2006, due to a database error, this posts company was swapped with the company of the review by Encoder. This can be confirmed by looking at Encoder's history and reading his forum posts about the issue. Unfortunately Coderific is unable to swap these posts back. So I have changed my previous review (which is now posted for Brainchild Products whom Encoder was reviewing) and have added this review >
This is my first more... -
Stay FAR AWAY from this one
posted
by
Encoder
on
October 05, 2006
Database Corruption. This isn't supposed to be here.

