Coderific

rating for Brainchild Products

1.0 Wrong Company! posted by flycrg on September 15, 2006

EDIT 13 SEP 2008, so apparently the review that I wrote 2 years ago got corrupted and somehow switched to another company. The review I originally wrote was for Adaptive Methods, a Northern VA based software company, and NOT for Brainchild Products. Contacting site admin to see if they can fix the mess up. From what it looks like, Brainchild Products is a company that I would not touch with a 10 foot pole though.

See 1 more rating for Brainchild Products!

0 comments

Write a comment!
    scores in this rating

    development process

    clear requirements 3.0
    design and planning 3.0
    quality assurance 3.0
    automated testing 2.0
    peer review 3.0
    development environment 3.0
    development hardware 4.0
    physical workspace 4.0
    infrastructure and support 3.0
    issue tracking 4.0
    source control 4.0
    product quality 3.0

    culture

    cultivation of creativity 3.0
    mitigation of risk 3.0
    reasonable workload 4.0
    prevention of crunch time 3.0
    hitting deadlines 4.0
    taking responsibility 3.0
    development autonomy 4.0
    keeping ego in check 3.0

    compensation

    salary 3.0
    health coverage 4.0
    paid time off 4.0
    snacks 4.0
    other perks 4.0

    organization

    advancement opportunities 4.0
    employee retention 3.0
    hiring process 4.0
    quality of development management 4.0
    quality of upper management 4.0
    quality of developers 3.0
    team-to-team communication 2.0
    internal team communication 4.0
    management-developer communication 4.0

    general

    location 3.0
    nearby food 3.0
    business model 4.0
    cool technology 2.0
    vision and strategy 4.0
    warm fuzzy feeling 3.0
    overall 1.0

    preferences

    casual dress code 3.0
    use of Free Software 3.0
    development of Free Software 2.0
    use of GNU/Linux 4.0
    use of Mac OS 1.0
    use of Solaris 2.0
    use of Windows 1.0
    use of BSD unrated
    use of Python 1.0
    use of Perl 1.0
    use of Ruby 1.0
    use of Lisp 1.0
    use of Java 3.0
    use of C# 1.0
    use of Objective-C unrated
    use of C 3.0
    use of C++ 3.0
    use of PHP unrated
    use of ASP unrated
    use of legacy languages unrated