Coderific

rating for Jobster

3.0 Developers are set up to succeed at Jobster posted on January 02, 2007

Jobster is a great company for software developers. A lot of the credit goes to the dev managers who created sane and manageable schedules, placed huge emphasis on shipping software regularly, who weren't afraid to do a little triage when necessary, and who built a rock solid QA team in Seattle to ensure that we were always shipping quality product.

See 3 more ratings for Jobster!

0 comments

Write a comment!
    scores in this rating

    development process

    clear requirements 3.0
    design and planning 4.0
    quality assurance 4.0
    automated testing 4.0
    peer review 4.0
    development environment 4.0
    development hardware 4.0
    physical workspace 4.0
    infrastructure and support 4.0
    issue tracking 4.0
    source control 4.0
    product quality 2.0

    culture

    cultivation of creativity 4.0
    mitigation of risk 3.0
    reasonable workload 4.0
    prevention of crunch time 4.0
    hitting deadlines 4.0
    taking responsibility 4.0
    development autonomy 4.0
    keeping ego in check 4.0

    compensation

    salary 4.0
    health coverage 4.0
    paid time off 3.0
    snacks 4.0
    other perks 3.0

    organization

    advancement opportunities 2.0
    employee retention 3.0
    hiring process 3.0
    quality of development management 4.0
    quality of upper management 3.0
    quality of developers 3.0
    team-to-team communication 3.0
    internal team communication 4.0
    management-developer communication 4.0

    general

    location 2.0
    nearby food 1.0
    business model 1.0
    cool technology 2.0
    vision and strategy 2.0
    warm fuzzy feeling 3.0
    overall 3.0

    preferences

    casual dress code 4.0
    use of Free Software 4.0
    development of Free Software 3.0
    use of GNU/Linux 4.0
    use of Mac OS 3.0
    use of Solaris unrated
    use of Windows 3.0
    use of BSD unrated
    use of Python unrated
    use of Perl 3.0
    use of Ruby 4.0
    use of Lisp 2.0
    use of Java 4.0
    use of C# unrated
    use of Objective-C unrated
    use of C unrated
    use of C++ unrated
    use of PHP unrated
    use of ASP unrated
    use of legacy languages unrated