Coderific

rating for Softscape

1.0 Not even worth 1 Star posted on May 28, 2009

Evilscape is the virus you don't want handling your company's or agency's information. It would be interesting to see what connections they had with Gov. Rowland's administration to get the contract in Connecticut. Amazingly, Terry Borjeson, former Connecticut Judicial Branch Court Support Services Administrator, is no longer with Softscape. Wonder what happened there.

See 17 more ratings for Softscape!

1 comment

Write a comment!
  • Re: Not even worth 1 Star posted on May 28, 2009 12:24 PM

    This can be found with an easy google

    http://www.vault.com/survey/employee/Softscape-Career-outlook-96016.html

    Business Outlook Survey
    Manager The outlook of the company is mixed in the sense that the owners will profit if they sell before they get caught up in past scandals. There are very few besides the inner circle of employees that stand to profit. The company's association with several Connecticut state agencies was it's bread and butter for awhile through 2001. If you recall, Governor Rowland was in office and Softscape lobbied his IT Chief to get a leg up on any competition in the state. We know what happened to Rowland. He resigned in disgrace on June 22, 2004. The company also plucked Terry Borjeson from his state position in CT to further entrench themselves in the multi-million dollar gravy train know as the State of Connecticut. There were several tense meetings with other government agencies from other states who were continually displeased with the product that Softscape created. Instead of having productive problem solving meetings, the brass at the company would try to gloss things over and offer the customer an expensive lunch. I truly believed then that the company's poor reputation would finally catch up to the arrogant indifference that the company had towards existing customers. The State of Arkansas (Pulaski County) is the most recent victim to Softscape's failed promises. 'Pulaski County has paid $451,196.52 for a software system that does not work,' Mankin-Mitchell wrote in a letter to Softscape, Inc. President, Hank Watkins. Such a quote makes me wonder how many 'software' licenses they cooked up to get that figure of $451,196.52. The company also had trouble meeting payroll and expenses and had no clear understanding of when it was fiscally responsibly to expand its operations or increase it's staff. In order to save money they had a common method of firing salespeople when they were due to be paid and would also not pay them on their commissions. They would never put anything in writing when it came to requesting a rate of commissions on a sale. They used their own 'variable' rate. The variable being they pay you what and when they want or they don't pay you at. There were at least two former sales representatives that were involved in a class action lawsuit and I believe there are more. It is my understanding that the suit is asking for more than $75k. There are several other legal problems that the company continues to deal with. It will likely be a matter of when, not if, a State Attorney General's office of consumer affairs gets a complaint from a bilked state agency. Most employees, if they could speak freely, would express there unhappiness with the company and how it runs. It doesn't take more than a few days, or weeks at the most, to understand that you made a big mistake accepting Softscape's offer of employment. The new job search begins once you've come to this realization inside of the Wayland office.

    reply | quote

scores in this rating

development process

clear requirements unrated
design and planning unrated
quality assurance unrated
automated testing unrated
peer review unrated
development environment unrated
development hardware unrated
physical workspace unrated
infrastructure and support unrated
issue tracking unrated
source control unrated
product quality unrated

culture

cultivation of creativity unrated
mitigation of risk unrated
reasonable workload unrated
prevention of crunch time unrated
hitting deadlines unrated
taking responsibility unrated
development autonomy unrated
keeping ego in check unrated

compensation

salary unrated
health coverage unrated
paid time off unrated
snacks unrated
other perks unrated

organization

advancement opportunities unrated
employee retention unrated
hiring process unrated
quality of development management unrated
quality of upper management unrated
quality of developers unrated
team-to-team communication unrated
internal team communication unrated
management-developer communication unrated

general

location unrated
nearby food unrated
business model unrated
cool technology unrated
vision and strategy unrated
warm fuzzy feeling unrated
overall 1.0

preferences

casual dress code unrated
use of Free Software unrated
development of Free Software unrated
use of GNU/Linux unrated
use of Mac OS unrated
use of Solaris unrated
use of Windows unrated
use of BSD unrated
use of Python unrated
use of Perl unrated
use of Ruby unrated
use of Lisp unrated
use of Java unrated
use of C# unrated
use of Objective-C unrated
use of C unrated
use of C++ unrated
use of PHP unrated
use of ASP unrated
use of legacy languages unrated